Tag Archives: politics

Air Quality in Gillygate

Gillygate – traffic on a normal day

Gillygate Air Quality meeting 25/07/2023

I attended this meeting with Ian McNabb and Rich Hearn. We joined residents from Gillygate, Lord Mayors Walk (LMW), Portland Street and business owners from Gillygate Guest House and Love Cheese. Two representative from York Civic Trust also attended. The meeting was led by Brendan Hopkins who has lived in Gillygate House for the last 2 years. (Brendan is a company chairman with links to property, media and horse racing)

From the council side the meeting was hosted by Cllr. Peter Kilbane.(Dep Leader) Cllrs. Kate Ravillious (Env and Climate Emergency), Tony Clarke (Guildhall Ward) and Rachel Melly (Guildhall Ward) also attended. Council staff included James Gilchrist, Director of Environment, Transport and Planning, and other officers.

The session began with Brendan Hopkins outlining the problems. Air Quality worst in Yorkshire, diesel bus emissions (retrofitting engines to reduce emissions not working), stationary traffic, phasing of lights, properties having to keep windows closed, evidence of black dust on window ledges and steps, size of lorries on the street, health hazards etc. He suggested measures including stopping diesel bus access and introducing more electric buses, removing Gillygate from SatNav maps, reducing traffic flows, a campaign to persuade motorists to switch off engines whilst idling in traffic queues and looking at the phasing of traffic lights.

This was followed by anecdotal accounts from all attendees. Health issues, tasting pollution on the doorstep, children at risk from car fumes (they are much closer to exhaust pipe emissions that adults and far more vulnerable). Elderly people advised not to leave their homes at peak traffic times. Accounts of how much traffic and congestion had increased over the last 20 years. A drawing by Rich Hearn’s 8 year old son, Seth, (No11) expressing his view of the problem and action that could be taken was circulated to much approval in the room. Rich made a well researched and passionate contribution to the meeting.

The YCT people referred to their report about the problems presented by Gillygate’s traffic. (Some of us were involved in the original presentation of that report at a photoshoot in Exhibition Square some time ago) Their report suggests reducing traffic in Gillygate through a number of well researched measures, including a ‘bus gate’ (a section of Gillygate being accessible only to buses at certain times of day), no left turn from Bootham to Gillygate and LMW to Gillygate to divert traffic away.

The councillors responded by looking forward to their Local Traffic Plan, which the previous adminstration had failed to deliver to deadline 2 years ago. They said they aimed to have a draft ready for a meeting in October. If approved there would a public consultation with the earliest final approval by Spring of 2024. The implementation of that plan would of course follow over a period of time so that legal and financial plans could be put in place.

It was also disclosed that the phasing of the traffic lights on Gillygate had been changed. It was originally set to control the volume of traffic allowed into Gillygate but had been altered at some point so that it no longer fulfils that function. James Gilchrist promised to look at the phasing again to see if it could again reduce the traffic flow to limit the number of stationary vehicles in the street. Inevitably it would mean traffic would have to be held elsewhere increasing pollution in those areas – e.g. Bootham, LMW and Clarence Street. We were also told of new regulations from central government that will allow drivers who stop in a yellow box junction (as at Bootham and LMW) to be prosecuted using camera evidence. At present only the police can enforce the yellow box rules and rarely do, if ever. That may also reduce congestion.

Buses. A request was made for negotiations between the council and bus operators to use different routes and/or increase the use of electric buses. The council said there was limited scope for enforcing change on bus operators as they were independent providers of bus services. We were told that Gillygate is in a Low Emision Zone and buses have to comply with low emission zone rules although open top buses are exempt from that legislation. Enforcement is difficult and it was largely felt that some, possibly many, vehicles do not meet the low emission standards.

We discovered government limits for NO2 in the air have not been revised since the World Health Organisation suggested cutting them by half. This means that Gillygate is more than 41/2 times the healthy limit, which all agreed is unacceptable. Further to those figures there are other gases and particulates that exceed healthy limits.

James Gilchrist didn’t think it was possible to remove Gillygate from SatNav routes. The systems are driven by algorithms which analyse traffic flows and base their suggested routes on those behaviours. This was challenged with anecdotes from other parts of the world.

So is there any immediate action apart from waiting for the above suggestions? The challenge was thrown open to us. Could we produce signs for display locally that encourage drivers to switch off their engines whilst queuing  – perhaps based on Seth’s drawings? An appeal to protect our children rather than an order to beat drivers over the head with legislation that no one can enforce? Something for residents and others to take up.

I felt the meeting was positive, with a good reception from officers and councillors. There is inevitable frustration things can’t be changed faster but there was a commitment to change – only time will tell how much is implemented. There was some suggestion of civil action if change is delayed. York Civic Trust and some residents asked for a monthly meeting with council representatives to monitor progress and to offer further feedback. This was agreed by Cllr Kilbane.

We’ll keep you posted.

Subsequently the Councillors have issued a story apparently as a result of our meeting.

Electric vehicles aren’t the answer for cleaner air in York, says climate boss

Local Radio safe?

Just heard Nick Clegg say on BBC Radio Sheffield that local radio is very important and he can’t imagine it being closed down. Nick Higham (I think it wad him) said to Radio5Live that after talking to the BBC he didn’t think it was an idea that was very high on their agenda.

Shadow minister demands meeting over ‘radio cuts’ | News | Broadcast

Shadow minister demands meeting over ‘radio cuts’

Shadow culture secretary Ivan Lewis has demanded a meeting with BBC bosses over reports that local radio services could be axed and replaced with content from Radio 5 Live.

The National Union of Journalists (NUJ) said proposals had been aired to produce only local breakfast and drive-time shows and fill the gap with 5 Live programmes.

It said this would mean the loss of around 700 jobs and the possible closure of some stations.

Lewis said: ???At a time when Jeremy Hunt is forcing the BBC to spend ??25 million on local TV, it is perverse that the Conservative-led Government cuts may threaten the future of local radio.

???I will be seeking an urgent meeting with the BBC to discuss the range of options under consideration.???

It was reported the proposals were aired as part of the BBC???s Delivering Quality First review, which is tasked with finding savings following the six-year licence-fee freeze.

A BBC spokesman said: ???No decisions have been made so it would be wrong to speculate. It is, of course, only right that BBC staff have an opportunity to input ideas about shaping the BBC???s future.

???The Delivering Quality First sessions are designed to provoke discussion amongst staff about the way the BBC works and any decisions coming out of the process would be subject to approval by the BBC Trust.???

Ivan Lewis is making a good point here.
???At a time when Jeremy Hunt is forcing the BBC to spend ??25 million on local TV, it is perverse that the Conservative-led Government cuts may threaten the future of local radio.”

Coercing people into a brave new digital world | spiked

Coercing people into a brave??new??digital world

A government-backed campaign to get the entire UK adult population online threatens to make cyber slaves of us all.

Why do we think everyone should be online and surfing? There are some really useful observations in this Spiked article. Worth a read.

Labour must seize the “big society” idea from Cameron

Labour must seize the “big society” idea from Cameron

Labour would be foolish to reject David Cameron’s “big society” idea entirely, writes Jonathan Freedland. Cameron likes to suggest that the notion of a big society chimes with an ethos that lies deep in Toryism. Yet whatever ideals pre-industrial Toryism cherished, they are a long way from the worldview of the post-Thatcher Conservative Party. A big society needs people anchored in place and blessed with time, yet Conservative economics grants neither — except to the well-off. Labour needs to seize this idea from Cameron and reclaim its Labour origins — and then improve it. That would start with a realisation that a truly big society does not entail public services on the cheap. Labour should also notice the big gap in Cameron’s big society. His idea rests on the notion that the only obstacle in people’s way is the state. But what is good for the public-sector state is surely good for the private-sector gander.

Big Society needs people anchored in place and blessed with time – I suspect there are not many of these people. Small Society then.

David Cameron ‘does God’ in fuzzy, sort-of-Anglican way

David Cameron ‘does God’ in fuzzy, sort-of-Anglican way

David-cameronWe all suspected that when Alastair Campbell told journalists that Tony Blair did not ‘do God’, this was because of the uncomfortable truth that the then British Prime Minister did God rather too well for comfort. Best to ignore his faith altogether than have to face questions about praying with President Bush about going to war or deny reports of pending conversion to Rome that everyone knew would turn out to be true. Denialism is after all a heresy not listed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church – yet.

It is a relief for those of us who have to fish facts from this slippery net with our pens to discover that will be no need for any comparable Christian coyness from David Cameron’s advisers. How reassuring to discover that  Cameron’s version of doing God is so very Church of English.

This revelation comes in an interview with Evening Standard editor Geordie Greig, published today.

Interesting how so many of our political leaders have significant links to the Christian faith.